↓ Skip to main content

Successive introduction of four new vaccines in Rwanda: High coverage and rapid scale up of Rwanda's expanded immunization program from 2009 to 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successive introduction of four new vaccines in Rwanda: High coverage and rapid scale up of Rwanda's expanded immunization program from 2009 to 2013
Published in
Vaccine, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurice Gatera, Sunil Bhatt, Fidele Ngabo, Mathilde Utamuliza, Hassan Sibomana, Corine Karema, Cathy Mugeni, Cameron T. Nutt, Sabin Nsanzimana, Claire M. Wagner, Agnes Binagwaho

Abstract

As the pace of vaccine uptake accelerates globally, there is a need to document low-income country experiences with vaccine introductions. Over the course of five years, the government of Rwanda rolled out vaccines against pneumococcus, human papillomavirus, rotavirus, and measles & rubella achieving over 90% coverage for each. To carry out these rollouts, Rwanda's Ministry of Health engaged in careful review of disease burden information and extensive, cross-sectoral planning at least one year before introducing each vaccine. Rwanda's local leaders, development partners, civil society organizations and widespread community health worker network were mobilized to support communication efforts. Community health workers were also used to confirm target population size. Support from Gavi, UNICEF and WHO was used in combination with government funds to promote country ownership and collaboration. Vaccination was also combined with additional community-based health interventions. Other countries considering rapid consecutive or simultaneous rollouts of new vaccines may consider lessons from Rwanda's experience while tailoring the strategies used to local context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 19%
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 58 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,699,550
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#2,270
of 16,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,732
of 380,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#37
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.