↓ Skip to main content

Global Existence of Strong Solutions to the Cucker–Smale–Stokes System

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Global Existence of Strong Solutions to the Cucker–Smale–Stokes System
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00021-015-0237-2
Authors

Hyeong-Ohk Bae, Young-Pil Choi, Seung-Yeal Ha, Moon-Jin Kang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,433,196
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#133
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,576
of 391,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.