| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel Tremblay, Mike Dolph, Sachin Patel, Patricia Brandt, Anna Forsythe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,854,917
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#59
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,139
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.