↓ Skip to main content

Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00221-015-4523-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatemeh Yavari, Shirin Mahdavi, Farzad Towhidkhah, Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh, Hamed Ekhtiari, Mohammad Darainy

Abstract

Despite several pieces of evidence, which suggest that the human brain employs internal models for motor control and learning, the location of these models in the brain is not yet clear. In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to manipulate right cerebellar function, while subjects adapt to a visuomotor task. We investigated the effect of this manipulation on the internal forward and inverse models by measuring two kinds of behavior: generalization of training in one direction to neighboring directions (as a proxy for inverse models) and localization of the hand position after movement without visual feedback (as a proxy for forward model). The experimental results showed no effect of cerebellar tDCS on generalization, but significant effect on localization. These observations support the idea that the cerebellum is a possible brain region for internal forward, but not inverse model formation. We also used a realistic human head model to calculate current density distribution in the brain. The result of this model confirmed the passage of current through the cerebellum. Moreover, to further explain some observed experimental results, we modeled the visuomotor adaptation process with the help of a biologically inspired method known as population coding. The effect of tDCS was also incorporated in the model. The results of this modeling study closely match our experimental data and provide further evidence in line with the idea that tDCS manipulates FM's function in the cerebellum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 29%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 25%
Psychology 18 17%
Engineering 9 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,913
of 3,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,472
of 391,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#45
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.