| Title |
Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-018-4672-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon D. Schiff, Elissa Klinger, Alejandra Salazar, Jeffrey Medoff, Mary G. Amato, E. John Orav, Shimon Shaykevich, Enrique V. Seoane, Lake Walsh, Theresa E. Fuller, Patricia C. Dykes, David W. Bates, Jennifer S. Haas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 13% |
| Psychology | 25 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 88 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,105,239
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,472
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,373
of 347,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#53
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.