You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low diversity of the gut microbiota in infants with atopic eczema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.10.025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-75901
|
| Authors |
Thomas R. Abrahamsson, Hedvig E. Jakobsson, Anders F. Andersson, Bengt Björkstén, Lars Engstrand, Maria C. Jenmalm |
| Abstract |
It is debated whether a low total diversity of the gut microbiota in early childhood is more important than an altered prevalence of particular bacterial species for the increasing incidence of allergic disease. The advent of powerful, cultivation-free molecular methods makes it possible to characterize the total microbiome down to the genus level in large cohorts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 645 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 622 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 101 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 85 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 11% |
| Other | 47 | 7% |
| Other | 117 | 18% |
| Unknown | 142 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 145 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 136 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 69 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 69 | 11% |
| Unknown | 159 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#313,338
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#266
of 11,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,515
of 250,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#2
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.