↓ Skip to main content

Walk to me when I smile, step back when I’m angry: emotional faces modulate whole-body approach–avoidance behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Walk to me when I smile, step back when I’m angry: emotional faces modulate whole-body approach–avoidance behaviors
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2767-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F. Stins, Karin Roelofs, Jody Villan, Karen Kooijman, Muriel A. Hagenaars, Peter J. Beek

Abstract

Facial expressions are potent social cues that can induce behavioral dispositions, such as approach-avoidance tendencies. We studied these tendencies by asking participants to make whole-body forward (approach) or backward (avoidance) steps on a force plate in response to the valence of social cues (happy or angry faces) under affect-congruent and incongruent mappings. Posturographic parameters of the steps related to automatic stimulus evaluation, step initiation (reaction time), and step execution were determined and analyzed as a function of stimulus valence and stimulus-response mapping. The main result was that participants needed more time to initiate a forward step towards an angry face than towards a smiling face (which is evidence of a congruency effect), but with backward steps, this difference failed to reach significance. We also found a reduction in spontaneous body sway prior to the step with the incongruent mapping. The results provide a crucial empirical link between theories of socially induced action tendencies and theories of postural control and suggest a motoric basis for socially guided motivated behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 228 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 22%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 13 5%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 37 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 50%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 46 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,127,791
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#140
of 3,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,111
of 116,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.