| Title |
Nanostructured Al and Cu alloys with superior strength and electrical conductivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-015-9354-9 |
| Authors |
M. Yu Murashkin, I. Sabirov, X. Sauvage, R. Z. Valiev |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 45 | 42% |
| Engineering | 19 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,181,472
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#241
of 4,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,762
of 266,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.