↓ Skip to main content

Conductive filament formation in printed circuit boards: effects of reflow conditions and flame retardants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Conductive filament formation in printed circuit boards: effects of reflow conditions and flame retardants
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10854-011-0449-z
Authors

Bhanu Sood, Michael Pecht

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 33%
Materials Science 3 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,469,754
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
#109
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,460
of 121,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.