| Title |
Preventing future offending of delinquents and offenders: what have we learned from experiments and meta-analyses?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Criminology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11292-015-9244-9 |
| Authors |
Doris L. MacKenzie, David P. Farrington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 14% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 25% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,220,058
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#115
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,940
of 403,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.