↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota disruption leads to reduced cold tolerance in Drosophila flies

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Microbiota disruption leads to reduced cold tolerance in Drosophila flies
Published in
The Science of Nature, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00114-018-1584-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youn Henry, Hervé Colinet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 42%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,126,184
of 24,461,214 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#573
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,316
of 346,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,461,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.