You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acupuncture versus antidepressants in the management of postpartum depression: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Midwifery, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.12968/bjom.2018.26.10.670 |
| Authors |
Akari Komori, David Arthur, Samara Radford, Hsiewe Ying Tan, Li Zheng, Mira An, Rika Umeda, Zhen Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,898,702
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Midwifery
#35
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,804
of 345,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Midwifery
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.