| Title |
Population-Based Fracture Risk Assessment and Osteoporosis Treatment Disparities by Race and Gender
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-009-1031-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey R. Curtis, Leslie A. McClure, Elizabeth Delzell, Virginia J. Howard, Eric Orwoll, Kenneth G. Saag, Monika Safford, George Howard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,665,593
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,940
of 8,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,398
of 123,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.