↓ Skip to main content

Long-term recurrent bleeding risk after endoscopic therapy for definitive colonic diverticular bleeding: band ligation versus clipping

Overview of attention for article published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term recurrent bleeding risk after endoscopic therapy for definitive colonic diverticular bleeding: band ligation versus clipping
Published in
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoyoshi Nagata, Naoki Ishii, Mitsuru Kaise, Takuro Shimbo, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Junichi Akiyama, Naomi Uemura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 42%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,344,781
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#843
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,487
of 340,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#23
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.