↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a 12-week mixed power training on physical function in dynapenic-obese older men: does severity of dynapenia matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Effect of a 12-week mixed power training on physical function in dynapenic-obese older men: does severity of dynapenia matter?
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40520-018-1048-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Livia P. Carvalho, Charlotte H. Pion, Guy El Hajj Boutros, Pierrette Gaudreau, Stéphanie Chevalier, Marc Bélanger, José A. Morais, Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 74 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 82 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,446,325
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#535
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,449
of 358,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.