↓ Skip to main content

Nationwide Survey on Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Korea: 2003–2013 Results

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Nationwide Survey on Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Korea: 2003–2013 Results
Published in
Obesity Surgery, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11695-015-2030-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyuk-Joon Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, Youn Baik Choi, Sang-Moon Han, Sang-Uk Han, Yoon-Seok Heo, Kyoung Yul Hur, Eung Kook Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Young-Jin Kim, Hong Chan Lee, Joo Ho Lee, Do-Joong Park, Yun-Chan Park, Seung Ho Choi, The Information Committee of the Korean Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

Abstract

A survey to evaluate the current status of bariatric and metabolic operations in Korea was conducted. Data from 5467 cases (32 hospitals) were collected. The annual numbers of bariatric and metabolic operations increased each year, from 139 in 2003 to 1686 in 2013. Adjustable gastric band (AGB, 67.2 %) was the most common operation, followed by sleeve gastrectomy (SG, 14.2 %), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, 12.7 %). Mean patient age and body mass index (BMI) were 35.4 years and 35.9 kg/m2, respectively. In-hospital morbidity and mortality rates were 6 % (114/2305) and 0.25 % (5/2176), respectively. In Korea, AGB was the most common operation because of the availability and activity of specialized bariatric clinics. These national survey results established a baseline for future data collection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,433,196
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,539
of 3,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,829
of 392,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#68
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.