↓ Skip to main content

Double Jeopardy: Testing the Effects of Multiple Basic Skill Deficiencies on Successful Remediation

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Higher Education, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Double Jeopardy: Testing the Effects of Multiple Basic Skill Deficiencies on Successful Remediation
Published in
Research in Higher Education, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11162-006-9047-y
Authors

Peter Riley Bahr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 21%
Professor 9 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 58%
Psychology 4 8%
Linguistics 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,469,754
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#348
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,763
of 160,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.