| Title |
Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-11-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan M Rolf, Jeremy F Taylor, Robert D Schnabel, Stephanie D McKay, Matthew C McClure, Sally L Northcutt, Monty S Kerley, Robert L Weaber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 70% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#606
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,848
of 102,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.