You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An African loss-of-function CACNA1C variant p.T1787M associated with a risk of ventricular fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-32867-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malorie Blancard, Amal Debbiche, Koichi Kato, Christelle Cardin, Guichard Sabrina, Estelle Gandjbakhch, Vincent Probst, Michel Haissaguerre, Fabrice Extramiana, Mélèze Hocini, Geoffroy Olivier, Antoine Leenhardt, Pascale Guicheney, Jean-Sébastien Rougier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 50% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| Belgium | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,815,208
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#45,592
of 124,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,477
of 343,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,324
of 3,534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.