↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00268-015-3261-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Sato, Shin‐ichi Kosugi, Naotaka Aizawa, Takashi Ishikawa, Yosuke Kano, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Takaaki Hanyu, Kotaro Hirashima, Takeo Bamba, Toshifumi Wakai

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) using laryngoscopy after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma and to clarify the risk factors influencing postoperative RLNP. A total of 299 patients who underwent laryngoscopic examination after esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were found to have postoperative RLNP were followed up every 1-3 months, with a median follow-up period of 3 months. Recovery from paralysis was also evaluated on the basis of each affected nerve. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for RLNP. Cumulative recovery rate was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 178 (59.5 %) patients were diagnosed with RLNP by first laryngoscopy [bilateral in 59 (33.1 %) patients, right in 15 (8.4 %), and left in 104 (58.4 %)]. In 206 patients who underwent transthoracic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy, independent risk factors for RLNP were lymph node dissection along the right RLN (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.06-8.54, P = 0.04) and cervical anastomosis (OR 5.94, 95 % CI 1.78-19.80, P < 0.01). Cumulative recovery rate from RLNP was 61.7 % at 12 months after esophagectomy with 91 nerves eventually recovering from paralysis. Median recovery time was 6 months. RLNP developed in 60 % of patients after esophagectomy and may be associated with lymphadenectomy around the right RLN and cervical esophageal mobilization. Although 62 % of affected nerves recovered within 12 months, great attention should be given when performing these procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,797
of 4,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,177
of 279,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#51
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.