↓ Skip to main content

X Chromosome Dose and Sex Bias in Autoimmune Diseases: Increased Prevalence of 47,XXX in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sjögren's Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis & Rheumatology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
X Chromosome Dose and Sex Bias in Autoimmune Diseases: Increased Prevalence of 47,XXX in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Sjögren's Syndrome
Published in
Arthritis & Rheumatology, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/art.39560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke Liu, Biji T Kurien, Sarah L Zimmerman, Kenneth M Kaufman, Diana H Taft, Leah C Kottyan, Sara Lazaro, Carrie A Weaver, John A Ice, Adam J Adler, James Chodosh, Lida Radfar, Astrid Rasmussen, Donald U Stone, David M Lewis, Shibo Li, Kristi A Koelsch, Ann Igoe, Mitali Talsania, Jay Kumar, Jacen S Maier-Moore, Valerie M Harris, Rajaram Gopalakrishnan, Roland Jonsson, James A Lessard, Xianglan Lu, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Juan-Manuel Anaya, Deborah S Cunninghame-Graham, Andrew J W Huang, Michael T Brennan, Pamela Hughes, Gabor G Illei, Corinne Miceli-Richard, Edward C Keystone, Vivian P Bykerk, Gideon Hirschfield, Gang Xie, Wan-Fai Ng, Gunnel Nordmark, Per Eriksson, Roald Omdal, Nelson L Rhodus, Maureen Rischmueller, Michael Rohrer, Barbara M Segal, Timothy J Vyse, Marie Wahren-Herlenius, Torsten Witte, Bernardo Pons-Estel, Marta E Alarcon-Riquelme, Joel M Guthridge, Judith A James, Christopher J Lessard, Jennifer A Kelly, Susan D Thompson, Patrick M Gaffney, Courtney G Montgomery, Jeffrey C Edberg, Robert P Kimberly, Graciela S Alarcón, Carl L Langefeld, Gary S Gilkeson, Diane L Kamen, Betty P Tsao, W Joseph McCune, Jane E Salmon, Joan T Merrill, Michael H Weisman, Daniel J Wallace, Tammy O Utset, Erwin P Bottinger, Christopher I Amos, Katherine A Siminovitch, Xavier Mariette, Kathy L Sivils, John B Harley, R Hal Scofield

Abstract

More than 80% of autoimmune disease is female dominant, but the mechanism for this female bias is poorly understood. We suspected an X chromosome dose effect and hypothesized that trisomy X (47,XXX, 1 in ∼1,000 live female births) would be increased in female predominant diseases (e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], primary Sjögren's syndrome [SS], primary biliary cirrhosis [PBC] and rheumatoid arthritis [RA]) compared to diseases without female predominance (sarcoidosis) and controls. We identified 47,XXX subjects using aggregate data from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and confirmed, when possible, by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR). We found 47,XXX in seven of 2,826 SLE and three of 1,033 SS female patients, but only in two of the 7,074 female controls (p=0.003, OR=8.78, 95% CI: 1.67-86.79 and p=0.02, OR=10.29, 95% CI: 1.18-123.47; respectively). One 47,XXX subject was present for ∼404 SLE women and ∼344 SS women. 47,XXX was present in excess among SLE and SS subjects. The estimated prevalence of SLE and SS in women with 47,XXX was respectively ∼2.5 and ∼2.9 times higher than in 46,XX women and ∼25 and ∼41 times higher than in 46,XY men. No statistically significant increase of 47,XXX was observed in other female-biased diseases (PBC or RA), supporting the idea of multiple pathways to sex bias in autoimmunity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Master 10 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 53 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,211,971
of 24,451,065 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#770
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,659
of 303,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.