| Title |
Conditions for complex innovations: evidence from public organizations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Technology Transfer, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10961-018-9701-5 |
| Authors |
Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, David B. Audretsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 15% |
| Singapore | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 39 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,135,200
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#68
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,454
of 352,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Technology Transfer
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.