↓ Skip to main content

Combining phase images from array coils using a short echo time reference scan (COMPOSER)

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining phase images from array coils using a short echo time reference scan (COMPOSER)
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/mrm.26093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Daniel Robinson, Barbara Dymerska, Wolfgang Bogner, Markus Barth, Olgica Zaric, Sigrun Goluch, Günther Grabner, Xeni Deligianni, Oliver Bieri, Siegfried Trattnig

Abstract

To develop a simple method for combining phase images from multichannel coils that does not require a reference coil and does not entail phase unwrapping, fitting or iterative procedures. At very short echo time, the phase measured with each coil of an array approximates to the phase offset to which the image from that coil is subject. Subtracting this information from the phase of the scan of interest matches the phases from the coils, allowing them to be combined. The effectiveness of this approach is quantified in the brain, calf and breast with coils of diverse designs. The quality of phase matching between coil elements was close to 100% with all coils assessed even in regions of low signal. This method of phase combination was similar in effectiveness to the Roemer method (which needs a reference coil) and was superior to the rival reference-coil-free approaches tested. The proposed approach-COMbining Phase data using a Short Echo-time Reference scan (COMPOSER)-is a simple and effective approach to reconstructing phase images from multichannel coils. It requires little additional scan time, is compatible with parallel imaging and is applicable to all coils, independent of configuration. Magn Reson Med, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Researcher 28 28%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 23%
Physics and Astronomy 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Neuroscience 12 12%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#6,034
of 6,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,925
of 392,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#59
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.