↓ Skip to main content

Gait analysis of patients with an off-the-shelf total knee replacement versus customized bi-compartmental knee replacement

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Gait analysis of patients with an off-the-shelf total knee replacement versus customized bi-compartmental knee replacement
Published in
International Orthopaedics, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00264-017-3622-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry Wang, Jonathan Foster, Natasha Franksen, Jill Estes, Lindsey Rolston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,547,315
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#925
of 1,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,263
of 315,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.