↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Delay of Narcolepsy: Contributing Factors and Implications for Clinicians

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Vigilance, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic Delay of Narcolepsy: Contributing Factors and Implications for Clinicians
Published in
Sleep and Vigilance, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s41782-018-0046-9
Authors

Jagriti Bhattarai, Scott W. Sumerall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 30%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#19,075,450
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Vigilance
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,029
of 345,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Vigilance
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them