↓ Skip to main content

Alterations in gut bacterial and fungal microbiomes are associated with bacterial Keratitis, an inflammatory disease of the human eye

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings: Plant Sciences, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Alterations in gut bacterial and fungal microbiomes are associated with bacterial Keratitis, an inflammatory disease of the human eye
Published in
Proceedings: Plant Sciences, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12038-018-9798-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajagopalaboopathi Jayasudha, Sama Kalyana Chakravarthy, Gumpili Sai Prashanthi, Savitri Sharma, Prashant Garg, Somasheila I Murthy, Sisinthy Shivaji

Abstract

Dysbiosis, or imbalance in the gut microbiome, has been implicated in auto-immune, inflammatory, neurological diseases as well as in cancers. More recently it has also been shown to be associated with ocular diseases. In the present study, the association of gut microbiome dysbiosis with bacterial Keratitis, an inflammatory eye disease which significantly contributes to corneal blindness, was investigated. Bacterial and fungal gut microbiomes were analysed using fecal samples of healthy controls (HC, n = 21) and bacterial Keratitis patients (BK, n = 19). An increase in abundance of several antiinflammatory organisms including Dialister, Megasphaera, Faecalibacterium, Lachnospira, Ruminococcus and Mitsuokella and members of Firmicutes, Veillonellaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae was observed in HC compared to BK patients in the bacterial microbiome. In the fungal microbiome, a decrease in the abundance of Mortierella, Rhizopus, Kluyveromyces, Embellisia and Haematonectria and an increase in the abundance of pathogenic fungi Aspergillus and Malassezia were observed in BK patients compared to HC. In addition, heatmaps, PCoA plots and inferred functional profiles also indicated significant variations between the HC and BK microbiomes, which strongly suggest dysbiosis in the gut microbiome of BK patients. This is the first study demonstrating the association of gut microbiome with the pathophysiology of BK and thus supports the gut-eye axis hypothesis. Considering that Keratitis affects about 1 million people annually across the globe, the data could be the basis for developing alternate strategies for treatment like use of probiotics or fecal transplantation to restore the healthy microbiome as a treatment protocol for Keratitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,549,873
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#88
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,118
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them