You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Atypical CIDP: diagnostic criteria, progression and treatment response. Data from the Italian CIDP Database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pietro Emiliano Doneddu, Dario Cocito, Fiore Manganelli, Raffaella Fazio, Chiara Briani, Massimiliano Filosto, Luana Benedetti, Anna Mazzeo, Girolama Alessandra Marfia, Andrea Cortese, Brigida Fierro, Stefano Jann, Ettore Beghi, Angelo Maurizio Clerici, Marinella Carpo, Angelo Schenone, Marco Luigetti, Giuseppe Lauria, Giovanni Antonini, Tiziana Rosso, Gabriele Siciliano, Guido Cavaletti, Giuseppe Liberatore, Lucio Santoro, Erdita Peci, Stefano Tronci, Marta Ruiz, Stefano Cotti Piccinelli, Antonio Toscano, Giorgia Mataluni, Laura Piccolo, Giuseppe Cosentino, Mario Sabatelli, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Chile | 2 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,654,942
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#776
of 7,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,981
of 357,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#22
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.