You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bottom trawl fishing footprints on the world’s continental shelves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1802379115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo O. Amoroso, C. Roland Pitcher, Adriaan D. Rijnsdorp, Robert A. McConnaughey, Ana M. Parma, Petri Suuronen, Ole R. Eigaard, Francois Bastardie, Niels T. Hintzen, Franziska Althaus, Susan Jane Baird, Jenny Black, Lene Buhl-Mortensen, Alexander B. Campbell, Rui Catarino, Jeremy Collie, James H. Cowan, Deon Durholtz, Nadia Engstrom, Tracey P. Fairweather, Heino O. Fock, Richard Ford, Patricio A. Gálvez, Hans Gerritsen, María Eva Góngora, Jessica A. González, Jan G. Hiddink, Kathryn M. Hughes, Steven S. Intelmann, Chris Jenkins, Patrik Jonsson, Paulus Kainge, Mervi Kangas, Johannes N. Kathena, Stefanos Kavadas, Rob W. Leslie, Steve G. Lewis, Mathieu Lundy, David Makin, Julie Martin, Tessa Mazor, Genoveva Gonzalez-Mirelis, Stephen J. Newman, Nadia Papadopoulou, Paulette E. Posen, Wayne Rochester, Tommaso Russo, Antonello Sala, Jayson M. Semmens, Cristina Silva, Angelo Tsolos, Bart Vanelslander, Corey B. Wakefield, Brent A. Wood, Ray Hilborn, Michel J. Kaiser, Simon Jennings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 318 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 8% |
| Spain | 18 | 6% |
| Denmark | 17 | 5% |
| Sweden | 13 | 4% |
| France | 12 | 4% |
| Belgium | 10 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 133 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 232 | 73% |
| Scientists | 72 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 473 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 140 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 109 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 10% |
| Unknown | 166 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#79,907
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,876
of 103,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,552
of 358,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#36
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.