You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
北西ロシア―西シベリア河川の逆流計画とカスピ海・アラル海問題
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, January 1994
|
| DOI | 10.3178/jjshwr.7.454 |
| Authors |
村上 雅博 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#29
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,927
of 71,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.