↓ Skip to main content

Heart failure and diabetes: metabolic alterations and therapeutic interventions: a state-of-the-art review from the Translational Research Committee of the Heart Failure Association–European Society…

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
386 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heart failure and diabetes: metabolic alterations and therapeutic interventions: a state-of-the-art review from the Translational Research Committee of the Heart Failure Association–European Society of Cardiology
Published in
European Heart Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Maack, Michael Lehrke, Johannes Backs, Frank R Heinzel, Jean-Sebastien Hulot, Nikolaus Marx, Walter J Paulus, Patrick Rossignol, Heinrich Taegtmeyer, Johann Bauersachs, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Dirk Brutsaert, Heiko Bugger, Kieran Clarke, Francesco Cosentino, Gilles De Keulenaer, Alessandra Dei Cas, Arantxa González, Martin Huelsmann, Guido Iaccarino, Ida Gjervold Lunde, Alexander R Lyon, Piero Pollesello, Graham Rena, Niels P Riksen, Giuseppe Rosano, Bart Staels, Linda W van Laake, Christoph Wanner, Dimitrios Farmakis, Gerasimos Filippatos, Frank Ruschitzka, Petar Seferovic, Rudolf A de Boer, Stephane Heymans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 386 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Master 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 62 22%
Unknown 91 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 101 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#176,120
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#303
of 11,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,515
of 358,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#6
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.