↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Regional Wellbeing in Italy: An Application of Malmquist–DEA and Self-organizing Map Neural Clustering

Overview of attention for article published in Social Indicators Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Assessing Regional Wellbeing in Italy: An Application of Malmquist–DEA and Self-organizing Map Neural Clustering
Published in
Social Indicators Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0722-7
Authors

Oliviero A. Carboni, Paolo Russu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 12%
Lecturer 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 15 29%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 21%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Engineering 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#1,541
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,815
of 251,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.