| Title |
Passive recovery of an island bird community after rodent eradication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-015-1042-9 |
| Authors |
Donald A. Croll, Kelly M. Newton, Matthew McKown, Nick Holmes, Jeffrey C. Williams, Hillary S. Young, Stacey Buckelew, Coral A. Wolf, Gregg Howald, Milagra F. Bock, Jennifer A. Curl, Bernie R. Tershy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,001,591
of 25,482,409 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#122
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,160
of 400,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,482,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.