↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Unintended consequences of focusing on accommodations and supports as barriers for medical trainees with disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Unintended consequences of focusing on accommodations and supports as barriers for medical trainees with disabilities
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.70017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas D Lawson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,603,441
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3,335
of 8,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,152
of 346,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#81
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.