| Title |
Understanding biomass recalcitrance in grasses for their efficient utilization as biorefinery feedstock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11157-018-9485-y |
| Authors |
Aurélie Bichot, Jean-Philippe Delgenès, Valérie Méchin, Hélène Carrère, Nicolas Bernet, Diana García-Bernet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 21% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,178,215
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#161
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,411
of 350,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.