↓ Skip to main content

Determination of ED50 and time to effectiveness for intrathecal hydromorphone in laboring patients using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential allocation method

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Determination of ED50 and time to effectiveness for intrathecal hydromorphone in laboring patients using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential allocation method
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12871-018-0603-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikas O’Reilly-Shah, Grant C Lynde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,992,232
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#857
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,023
of 344,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.