You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current Status and Future Perspectives on Neoadjuvant Therapy in Lung Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gideon M Blumenthal, Paul A Bunn, Jamie E Chaft, Caroline E McCoach, Edith A Perez, Giorgio V Scagliotti, David P Carbone, Hugo J W L Aerts, Dara L Aisner, Jonas Bergh, Donald A Berry, Anthony Jarkowski, Nicholas Botwood, Darren A E Cross, Max Diehn, Nicole L Drezner, Robert C Doebele, Collin M Blakely, Wilfried E E Eberhardt, Enriqueta Felip, Luca Gianni, Steven P Keller, Patrick J Leavey, Shakun Malik, Francesco Pignatti, Tatiana M Prowell, Mary W Redman, Naiyer A Rizvi, Rafael Rosell, Valerie Rusch, Dirk de Ruysscher, Lawrence H Schwartz, Rajeshwari Sridhara, Rolf A Stahel, Stephen Swisher, Janis M Taube, William D Travis, Patricia Keegan, Jacinta R Wiens, Ignacio I Wistuba, Murry W Wynes, Fred R Hirsch, Mark G Kris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 50% |
| Italy | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,010,979
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#336
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,342
of 351,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#5
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.