↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of reverse development in Leptomedusae (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa): the case of Laodicea undulata (Forbes and Goodsir 1851)

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 3,535)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of reverse development in Leptomedusae (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa): the case of Laodicea undulata (Forbes and Goodsir 1851)
Published in
Marine Biology, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-0182-3
Authors

D. De Vito, S. Piraino, J. Schmich, J. Bouillon, F. Boero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 58%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#493,015
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#40
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#921
of 158,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.