You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bone marrow transplantation generates T cell–dependent control of myeloma in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Investigation, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1172/jci98888 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Slavica Vuckovic, Simone A Minnie, David Smith, Kate H Gartlan, Thomas S Watkins, Kate A Markey, Pamela Mukhopadhyay, Camille Guillerey, Rachel D Kuns, Kelly R Locke, Antonia L Pritchard, Peter A Johansson, Antiopi Varelias, Ping Zhang, Nicholas D Huntington, Nicola Waddell, Marta Chesi, John J Miles, Mark J Smyth, Geoffrey R Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 32% |
| Australia | 4 | 18% |
| Singapore | 2 | 9% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,641,080
of 24,397,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#2,162
of 16,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,648
of 445,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#25
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.