↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Genomics of a Host-Associated Commensal Bacterium in Fragmented Populations of Endangered Takahe

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Microbial Genomics of a Host-Associated Commensal Bacterium in Fragmented Populations of Endangered Takahe
Published in
Microbial Ecology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00248-015-0721-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoë L. Grange, Brett D. Gartrell, Patrick J. Biggs, Nicola J. Nelson, Marti Anderson, Nigel P. French

Abstract

Isolation of wildlife into fragmented populations as a consequence of anthropogenic-mediated environmental change may alter host-pathogen relationships. Our understanding of some of the epidemiological features of infectious disease in vulnerable populations can be enhanced by the use of commensal bacteria as a proxy for invasive pathogens in natural ecosystems. The distinctive population structure of a well-described meta-population of a New Zealand endangered flightless bird, the takahe (Porphyrio hochstetteri), provided a unique opportunity to investigate the influence of host isolation on enteric microbial diversity. The genomic epidemiology of a prevalent rail-associated endemic commensal bacterium was explored using core genome and ribosomal multilocus sequence typing (rMLST) of 70 Campylobacter sp. nova 1 isolated from one third of the takahe population resident in multiple locations. While there was evidence of recombination between lineages, bacterial divergence appears to have occurred and multivariate analysis of 52 rMLST genes revealed location-associated differentiation of C. sp. nova 1 sequence types. Our results indicate that fragmentation and anthropogenic manipulation of populations can influence host-microbial relationships, with potential implications for niche adaptation and the evolution of micro-organisms in remote environments. This study provides a novel framework in which to explore the complex genomic epidemiology of micro-organisms in wildlife populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 43%
Environmental Science 11 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,185,012
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,328
of 2,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,756
of 402,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.