↓ Skip to main content

Naming of undersea features

Overview of attention for article published in Geo-Marine Letters, September 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 211)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Naming of undersea features
Published in
Geo-Marine Letters, September 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02085926
Authors

Arnold H. Bouma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,576,904
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Geo-Marine Letters
#48
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,379
of 15,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geo-Marine Letters
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them