↓ Skip to main content

Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Women

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Women
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12170-015-0480-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebeccah A. McKibben, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Lena M. Mathews, Erin D. Michos

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women. Despite improvements in cardiovascular disease prevention efforts, there remain gaps in cardiovascular disease awareness among women, as well as age and racial disparities in ASCVD outcomes for women. Disparity also exists in the impact the traditional risk factors confer on ASCVD risk between women and men, with smoking and diabetes both resulting in stronger relative risks in women compared to men. Additionally there are risk factors that are unique to women (such as pregnancy-related factors) or that disproportionally affect women (such as auto-immune disease) where preventive efforts should be targeted. Risk assessment and management must also be sex-specific to effectively reduce cardiovascular disease and improve outcomes among women. Evidence supports the use of statin therapy for primary prevention in women at higher ASCVD risk. However, some pause should be given to prescribing aspirin therapy in women without known ASCVD, with most evidence supporting the use of aspirin for women≥65 years not at increased risk for bleeding. This review article will summarize (1) traditional and non-traditional assessments of ASCVD risk and (2) lifestyle and pharmacologic therapies for the primary prevention of ASCVD in women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 53 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,986,626
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
#85
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,943
of 401,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.