Title |
Non-pungent capsaicinoids from sweet pepper
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, February 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00394-003-0394-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonio Macho, Concepci�n Lucena, Rocio Sancho, Nives Daddario, Alberto Minassi, Eduardo Mu�oz, Giovanni Appendino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 23% |
Chemistry | 11 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,079,306
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#524
of 2,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,434
of 128,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.