| Title |
Recommendations for the conduct of clinical trials for drugs to treat or prevent sarcopenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-015-0517-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Yves Reginster, Cyrus Cooper, René Rizzoli, John A. Kanis, Geoff Appelboom, Ivan Bautmans, Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari, Maarten Boers, Maria Luisa Brandi, Olivier Bruyère, Antonio Cherubini, Bruno Flamion, Roger A. Fielding, Andrea Ildiko Gasparik, Luc Van Loon, Eugene McCloskey, Bruce H. Mitlak, Alberto Pilotto, Suzanne Reiter-Niesert, Yves Rolland, Yannis Tsouderos, Marjolein Visser, Alfonso J. Cruz-Jentoft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,508,088
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#541
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,714
of 405,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.