↓ Skip to main content

Embracing 3D Complexity in Leaf Carbon–Water Exchange

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Plant Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Embracing 3D Complexity in Leaf Carbon–Water Exchange
Published in
Trends in Plant Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Mason Earles, Thomas N Buckley, Craig R Brodersen, Florian A Busch, F Javier Cano, Brendan Choat, John R Evans, Graham D Farquhar, Richard Harwood, Minh Huynh, Grace P John, Megan L Miller, Fulton E Rockwell, Lawren Sack, Christine Scoffoni, Paul C Struik, Alex Wu, Xinyou Yin, Margaret M Barbour

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 8 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 40%
Environmental Science 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#446,202
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Plant Science
#65
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,652
of 358,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Plant Science
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.