| Title |
Comparison between procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to predict blood culture results in ICU patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2183-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bassetti, Alessandro Russo, Elda Righi, Elisabetta Dolso, Maria Merelli, Nicola Cannarsa, Federica D’Aurizio, Assunta Sartor, Francesco Curcio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 16% |
| Colombia | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 21% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,198,982
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,004
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,793
of 355,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.