| Title |
Pitfalls in Hemoglobin A1c Measurement: When Results may be Misleading
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2595-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael S. Radin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 20% |
| Colombia | 8 | 15% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 347 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 21% |
| Unknown | 108 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 120 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#667,784
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#520
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,256
of 209,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.