Title |
Is a positive clinical outcome after exercise therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain contingent upon a corresponding improvement in the targeted aspect(s) of performance? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-011-2045-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
F. Steiger, B. Wirth, E. D. de Bruin, A. F. Mannion |
Abstract |
The effect size for exercise therapy in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain (cLBP) is only modest. This review aims to analyse the specificity of the effect by examining the relationship between the changes in clinical outcome (pain, disability) and the changes in the targeted aspects of physical function (muscle strength, mobility, muscular endurance) after exercise therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 216 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 39 | 18% |
United States | 22 | 10% |
Canada | 19 | 9% |
Australia | 11 | 5% |
Spain | 6 | 3% |
Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
Brazil | 4 | 2% |
Norway | 3 | 1% |
Indonesia | 3 | 1% |
Other | 30 | 14% |
Unknown | 74 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 175 | 81% |
Scientists | 21 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 359 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 64 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 15% |
Other | 41 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 7% |
Researcher | 23 | 6% |
Other | 89 | 24% |
Unknown | 71 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 82 | 22% |
Sports and Recreations | 32 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 7% |
Unknown | 91 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#275,535
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#18
of 5,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#981
of 155,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.