| Title |
Nasal Administration of Cationic Nanoemulsions as Nucleic Acids Delivery Systems Aiming at Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Gene Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-018-2503-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roselena Silvestri Schuh, Juliana Bidone, Edina Poletto, Camila Vieira Pinheiro, Gabriela Pasqualim, Talita Giacomet de Carvalho, Mirian Farinon, Dirnete da Silva Diel, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Guilherme Baldo, Ursula Matte, Helder Ferreira Teixeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,238,450
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#992
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,865
of 341,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.