You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polypharmacy, deprescribing and shared decision‐making in primary care: the role of the accredited pharmacist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmacy Practice & Research, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jppr.1164 |
| Authors |
Kristen Anderson, Christopher Freeman, Debra Rowett, Judith Burrows, Ian Scott, Deborah Rigby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#5,225,628
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacy Practice & Research
#86
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,044
of 399,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacy Practice & Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them