↓ Skip to main content

Patients' experiences of communication and involvement in decision‐making about atrial fibrillation treatment in consultations with nurses and physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients' experiences of communication and involvement in decision‐making about atrial fibrillation treatment in consultations with nurses and physicians
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/scs.12276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleni Siouta, Ulla Hellström Muhli, Berith Hedberg, Anders Broström, Bjöörn Fossum, Klas Karlgren

Abstract

Insights in consultations across patient interactions with physicians and nurses are of vital importance for strengthening the patients' involvement in the treatment decision-making process. The experience of involvement and communication in decision-making from the patients' perspective has been sparsely explored. To examine how patients describe involvement in and communication about decision-making regarding treatment in consultations with nurses and physicians. Twenty-two patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), aged 37-90 years, were interviewed directly after their consultations with nurses and physicians in outpatient AF clinics in six Swedish hospitals. In consultations with nurses, the patients felt involved when obtaining clarifications about AF as a disease and its treatment and when preparing for and building up confidence in decision-making. In consultations with physicians, the patients felt involved when they could cooperate in decision-making, when acquiring knowledge, and when they felt that they were being understood. One shared category was found in consultations with both nurses and physicians, and the patients felt involved when they had a sense of trust and felt secure during and between consultations. Patients with AF stated that they would need to acquire knowledge and build up confidence and ability in order to be effectively involved in the decision-making about treatment. Despite not being actively involved in decision-making, patients felt involved through experiencing supportive and confirming communication. Attention must be given to the relationship with the patient to create the conditions for patient involvement in the consultation. This can be achieved through supportive communication attempting to create a feeling of clarity and building confidence. This will support involvement in decision-making concerning AF treatment and feelings of being understood and of trust in physicians and/or nurses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,638,669
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
#178
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,770
of 402,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.